AKWENO RESEARCH · OCTOBER 2026
Australian Property Investor Research — October 2026
The rental yields Australian investors are assessing, how they vary by price and location, and the equity positions behind them
Rental yield is the first number most property investors check. It is also the number most likely to change once price, location and the cost of owning the property are taken into account.
Akweno's October 2026 Property Investor Research analyses anonymised activity from Australian investors using our rental yield calculator to understand the gross and net yields being assessed by prospective buyers and existing owners, how those yields differ between price points and between major cities and regional Australia, and where investors are looking.
This month we also draw on activity from our equity forecast calculator to show how much equity and borrowing sits behind the properties investors are researching.
Unlike surveys of investor sentiment, this research is based on actual investment research activity.
Published November 2026 · Based on October 2026 research activity
October at a glance
Median gross rental yields assessed by the two investor cohorts, both lower than in September.
Compared with 3.51% for properties valued at $1.2m and above.
Four in ten location-based searches were focused outside Australia's major cities, up from 30% in September.
Buyers were assessing slightly higher yields than owners
After removing invalid and implausible observations, we analysed 141 rental yield sessions: 62 from people considering a purchase and 79 from owners checking a property they already hold.
Prospective buyers assessed a median gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 4.60% for existing owners, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.
- Average
- 5.25%
- Interquartile range
- 4.01% – 6.12%
- Average
- 5.12%
- Interquartile range
- 4.03% – 5.52%
The difference is in the top of the range
The bottom of both ranges was almost identical: the lower quartile was 4.01% for buyers and 4.03% for owners.
The upper quartile is where they diverged. A quarter of buyer sessions assessed a gross yield of 6.12% or more, compared with 5.52% for owners.
Prospective buyers were also assessing lower-priced properties. The median property value entered by buyers was $665,000, compared with $800,000 for owners, which, as the next section shows, is closely linked to yield.
Compared with September
In September, buyers assessed a median of 5.13% and owners 4.87%. Both medians were lower in October, and the October sample is larger (62 buyers and 79 owners, compared with 40 and 44), so the change should be read as a shift in the mix of properties being researched rather than a change in the market.
Gross yield fell as property value rose
Across all 141 sessions, the median gross rental yield was 4.72%, with the middle 50% falling between 4.02% and 5.89%.
Property value was the clearest driver of that spread. Sessions with a property value under $600k had a median gross yield of 6.22%. At $1.2m and above the median was 3.51%, a difference of 2.71 percentage points.
Roughly half of all sessions (51.8%) assessed a gross yield between 4% and 6%. A further 23.4% assessed 6% or more, and 24.8% assessed less than 4%.
What it means
Rents do not rise in proportion to prices, so more expensive properties tend to produce lower gross yields. An investor comparing a $500k property with a $1.5m property should expect the headline yields to differ for that reason alone, before considering growth prospects.
The $900k to $1.2m and $1.2m and above bands each contain fewer than 25 sessions and should be treated as indicative.
Regional locations were assessed at higher yields than major cities
Of the sessions where a suburb was recorded (52 sessions across 47 suburbs), major-city locations had a median gross yield of 4.28%, compared with 4.83% for regional locations.
The gap was wider at the average: 4.70% for major cities and 5.69% for regional locations, because a handful of regional sessions assessed very high yields.
The middle 50% of regional sessions fell between 4.65% and 6.24%, against 3.66% and 4.97% for major cities.
Small-sample caution
These figures come from 31 major-city and 21 regional sessions. Higher regional yields reflect lower purchase prices as well as stronger rent-to-price ratios, and should not be read as a ranking of locations or a measure of total return.
Running costs reduced the median yield by about one percentage point
The rental yield calculator also reports net yield once annual expenses are entered. The median net yield across the same 141 sessions was 3.85%, with the middle 50% between 2.96% and 4.83%.
The typical session lost 0.94 percentage points between gross and net yield. Prospective buyers assessed a median net yield of 3.99% and existing owners 3.71%.
8.5% of sessions entered no expenses at all, so the true gap between gross and net yield is likely to be somewhat larger than the figures above suggest.
Victoria led investor research in October
Victoria attracted the largest share of location-based property investment research in Akweno's October dataset, accounting for 34.6%.
Queensland followed with 23.1% and New South Wales with 21.2%. Together, the three largest states accounted for 78.8% of all location-based research.
Western Australia represented a further 11.5%. Smaller volumes of research were recorded in the Northern Territory, South Australia and Tasmania, and there was no research activity recorded for the ACT.
What it means
Queensland led the September data, while Victoria led in October. The movement is a reminder that monthly samples are small (52 location-based sessions in October) and that individual months should be read as a snapshot of what Akweno users were researching rather than a ranking of Australian investment markets.
Regional research rose to 40% of activity
Major-city markets remained the larger focus in October, accounting for 59.6% of location-based property research.
However, 40.4% of research activity was directed towards regional locations, up from 30% in September.
The balance differed considerably between states.
Victoria was again metropolitan-focused, with 77.8% of its research centred on Greater Melbourne. All six Western Australian sessions were in Greater Perth.
Queensland was the opposite. Only 25.0% of its research was in Greater Brisbane, with the remainder spread across regional centres including Townsville, Cairns, Toowoomba and the Sunshine Coast. In New South Wales, regional research represented 36.4% of activity.
Directional results
The Northern Territory, South Australia and Tasmania are flagged “Directional” above. Their individual city/regional percentages are included for transparency but should not be interpreted as representative of broader investor behaviour in those markets. “Major city” means inside a greater capital-city area; the Gold Coast, Newcastle, Geelong and Cairns are treated as regional.
The equity behind the research: typical loan-to-value was 55%
Yield describes the return on a property. Equity describes the position an investor holds in it. This month we also analysed 135Australian sessions on Akweno's equity forecast calculator (48 from people considering a purchase and 87 from owners checking a property they hold) to see how much was owed against the properties being modelled.
The median property value entered was $800,000 with a median loan of $440,000, leaving median equity of $384,000. The median loan-to-value ratio was 55.2%, with the middle 50% of sessions between 35.5% and 72.4%.
| Measure | Prospective buyers | Existing owners |
|---|---|---|
| Sessions analysed | 48 | 87 |
| Median property value | $900,000 | $760,000 |
| Median loan | $461,500 | $420,000 |
| Median equity | $460,000 | $350,000 |
| Median loan-to-value | 55.2% | 55.3% |
| Modelled as an investment | 25.0% | 18.4% |
| Modelling more than one property | 27.1% | 6.9% |
Buyers and owners reported almost identical loan-to-value ratios (55.2% and 55.3%). The difference was in scale: buyers were modelling more expensive properties, and a larger share were building a multi-property view. More than a quarter of buyer sessions (27.1%) included more than one property, compared with 6.9% of owner sessions.
Around one in five sessions (20.7%) modelled the property as an investment rather than a home. Those sessions involved lower-priced properties (median $700,000) and more leverage: 17.9% had a loan above 80% of value, compared with 8.4% of owner-occupied sessions. Median equity was $284,426 for investment properties and $400,000 for owner-occupied.
What it means
Pairing the two data sets suggests many investors are assessing returns on properties they hold with a meaningful equity buffer. At a 55% median loan-to-value ratio, the typical investor in this dataset is not heavily geared, so yield and running costs matter as much as growth to their outcome.
95.6%of equity sessions left the calculator's default 5% growth and 6% interest rate unchanged, so we do not report growth or interest assumptions as investor views. Only 28 sessions were modelled as investments, so investment-specific figures are directional.
What October tells us
- 1
Yields assessed by both groups were lower than in September
The median gross yield assessed by prospective buyers was 4.90% (September: 5.13%) and by existing owners 4.60% (September: 4.87%). Buyers continued to assess slightly higher yields than owners.
- 2
Property value explained more of the yield than anything else we measured
Sessions under $600k had a median gross yield of 6.22%, compared with 3.51% at $1.2m and above. Regional locations were also assessed at higher yields than major cities.
- 3
Regional research grew and Victoria led
Regional locations made up 40.4% of location-based research, up from 30% in September, and Victoria recorded the largest share of research at 34.6%.
- 4
Most equity calculations involved a moderate loan-to-value ratio
The median loan-to-value ratio was 55.2%, and 10.4% of sessions involved a loan above 80% of property value. Investors paired the equity calculator with the yield calculator to understand both the return and the position behind it.
October is the second report in the Akweno Australian Property Investor Research series. As more months are added, we will be able to examine which of these patterns persist and which are month-to-month noise.
About the data
This report analyses anonymised October 2026 activity from users of Akweno's Australian Rental Yield Calculator and Equity Forecast Calculator.
The objective is to measure genuine property investment research behaviour rather than every interaction with the calculators.
Before analysis, the data was cleaned to:
- include Australian activity only
- exclude users who selected “Just learning” and sessions with no stated purpose
- include only sessions from people considering a purchase or checking a property they own
- remove obvious testing, incomplete or play-around inputs
- remove statistically implausible observations
For the yield analysis, observations with a gross rental yield below 1% or above 15%, or a property value outside $100,000 to $50 million, were excluded, leaving 141 sessions.
For the equity analysis, sessions with a property value outside $100,000 to $50 million, a loan below $10,000 or a loan greater than the property value were excluded, leaving 135 sessions. Equity is calculated as property value less loan amount.
The location analysis separately required a suburb to be recorded and matched to a single state, which is a stricter condition than the yield analysis. Where a suburb name exists in several states, the median rent and sale price recorded in the session were used to choose the correct one; sessions that could not be matched were excluded from the location analysis only, leaving 52 sessions.
All published results are aggregated. The report does not identify individual users or individual properties.
How to interpret Akweno research
Akweno Property Investor Research measures behaviour within the Akweno research dataset.
It is not intended to represent every Australian property investor, every property transaction or the Australian property market as a whole.
Smaller state, territory and price-band samples should be treated as directional.
The value of the research is in observing what investors using Akweno are actively investigating and, over time, identifying changes in those behaviours.
About Akweno Australian Property Investor Research
Akweno Australian Property Investor Research is a monthly series examining anonymised property-investment research activity.
Rather than asking investors what they might do, we analyse what investors are actively researching — including locations, rental yields and other investment characteristics.
As the dataset develops, future reports will track how these behaviours change over time.
Research your own property investment
Akweno helps property investors move from a quick calculation to a deeper understanding of an investment — including rental yield, cash flow, equity and longer-term property performance.
Copyright & research attribution
© 2026 exant.io Pty Ltd (trading as Akweno). All rights reserved.
This report contains original research and analysis produced by Akweno using anonymised activity from its property investment tools.
You are welcome to reference or quote findings from this report with clear attribution to Akweno Property Investor Research and a link to the original report.
Reproduction of substantial portions of the report, charts or underlying datasets requires prior written permission.
